Enterprise transformation programs are high-stakes initiatives. They span business units, integrate technologies, and need executive support to stay on track. Many organizations still struggle with unclear decision-making, reactive problem-solving, and program drift.
Weak governance is often the root cause.
At Andrew Reise, we define governance as the backbone of program management—the structure, rhythm, and discipline that keeps strategy, execution, and accountability aligned. Good governance ensures the right people make the right decisions at the right time with the right information.
We’ll explore the foundational elements of program management governance, including the frameworks, roles, and routines that enable delivery at scale.
Before you build routines, define your program’s governance structure. This organizational blueprint outlines who makes decisions, who manages risks, and who tracks progress.
We recommend establishing three primary layers:
In a recent retail customer experience (CX) transformation, we used this three-tiered structure to align more than 20 workstreams—including point of sale (POS), loyalty, analytics, and training—under one unified program charter, creating clarity and minimizing duplication across efforts.
Governance isn’t static—it’s a living process that requires routine interaction. These touchpoints keep stakeholders aligned, identify emerging risks, and enforce accountability.
Here’s a sample cadence we’ve implemented in large-scale programs:
|
Meeting |
Participants |
Purpose |
Frequency |
|
ESC meeting |
Sponsors, VPs, PMO, vendors |
Strategic decisions, value tracking |
Monthly |
|
PMO status meeting |
PMO leads, project managers |
Risk review, milestone tracking |
Weekly |
|
Workstream standups |
Functional leads, subject-matter experts (SMEs) |
Daily execution coordination |
Daily or twice weekly |
|
Risk and issue review |
PMO, SMEs |
Escalation triage and mitigation |
Biweekly |
|
Roadmap reviews |
PMO, ESC |
Update on timeline and dependencies |
Quarterly |
These meetings aren’t about process for the sake of process—they’re designed to surface the right issues to the right people. Even well-structured programs lose visibility and momentum without this consistency.
The clarity of decision-making is one of the most overlooked aspects of governance. Programs stall when no one knows who can approve scope changes, resolve conflicts, or shift funding.
We help clients implement a responsible, accountable, consulted, and informed (RACI) model to define decision rights across key categories:
|
Decision Area |
Accountable Party |
|
Scope change |
Program sponsor |
|
Budget adjustment |
Finance lead |
|
Vendor substitution |
ESC |
|
Technical design approval |
IT lead |
|
Change management plan |
PMO and operations |
This approach eliminates ambiguity. Everyone knows who holds the pen.
With one past insurance client, we helped resolve months-long scope paralysis by formalizing decision authority in a governance charter. This resulted in faster approvals, clearer accountability, and less rework.
Programs evolve—it’s inevitable. But without a structured change control process, even small adjustments can create downstream chaos.
We help clients implement a lightweight but disciplined model that includes:
A past financial services client used this model to triage more than 80 change requests during a 12-month program. It prevented scope creep while maintaining agility.
Governance works only when people can see what’s happening. We provide clients with tools that make governance visible and actionable:
During one enterprise-wide CRM implementation, we developed a dashboard that displayed not only project status but also end-user adoption, training completion, and Net Promoter Score (NPS) shifts by business unit. It kept leadership focused on outcomes, not just activities.
Governance frameworks provide the necessary decision-making structure, reporting cadence, and escalation channels needed to manage complexity and risk.
A past logistics client needed to modernize its digital platform while integrating with dozens of upstream and downstream systems. The initial program effort struggled with misaligned workstreams, reactive firefighting, and unclear executive engagement.
We designed and implemented a governance framework that included:
Within three months, program health improved across all dimensions—fewer escalations, faster decisions, and more confidence in execution. By the time the platform launched, the governance model had become standard operating procedure across the enterprise.
Strong program management governance provides the clarity, cadence, and confidence necessary for success.
Effective governance leads to:
If your program is struggling with indecision or a lack of clear direction, it’s time to rethink your approach.
We specialize in helping companies of all sizes implement program management frameworks that drive results and become a standard operating procedure across the organization. Partner with Andrew Reise to create a structure that enables execution at every level.