How Speech Analytics Exposed 18% Repeat Call Volume in a Travel Contact Center
Designing a Speech Analytics Program to identify call drivers, reduce repeat contacts, and enable data-driven quality management
What Is a Contact Center Speech Analytics Program and Why Does It Matter?
A contact center speech analytics program is a structured capability that uses voice analysis technology to process recorded customer calls and surface patterns in what customers are saying, how agents are responding, and what is driving call volume. Unlike manual quality monitoring, which can realistically review only a small fraction of total interactions, speech analytics operates at scale across every recorded call, providing a statistically valid and complete view of contact center behavior.
For organizations managing high call volumes across complex product lines, the absence of speech analytics creates a fundamental visibility gap: leadership may know how many calls are coming in, but not why.
Client Opportunity
A large membership retail travel company operated a 500-agent contact center handling millions of member calls annually across multiple lines of business including cruise, vacation packages, hotels, cars, and air. The organization had an established contact center operation with routing infrastructure, a quality monitoring program, and a workforce management function already in place.
Despite that operational infrastructure, the organization lacked granular visibility into why members were calling. Agents used between 6 and 10 manual wrap codes to classify calls after each interaction, producing an incomplete and often unreliable picture of call driver distribution. Quality monitoring was entirely manual, with coaches listening to approximately 2 calls per agent per 28-day period, a coverage rate insufficient to detect systemic patterns or measure program effectiveness at scale.
Andrew Reise was engaged to design and implement a comprehensive speech analytics program, beginning with the cruise line of business as the highest-priority segment, and deliver the strategic framework for extending the capability across all lines of business.
The Challenge
The contact center was operating with limited analytical visibility into its own call volume, relying on manual processes that produced incomplete data and insufficient quality coverage. Leadership needed an intelligence infrastructure capable of diagnosing call drivers, identifying resolution failures, and supporting self-service and coaching strategies. The challenges compounded each other: each gap in visibility made the others harder to address.

Inadequate call driver data
With only 6 to 10 manual wrap codes covering a multi-line-of-business operation, the organization had no statistically valid picture of why members were calling. The wrap code taxonomy was too broad to distinguish between distinct call types within a single line of business, and agent-assigned codes introduced classification inconsistency that made trend analysis unreliable.
High repeat call volume
Repeat calls, defined as a member calling back on an unresolved issue from a prior interaction, represented 18% of all contact center interactions, accounting for more than 73,000 calls. This volume represented both a direct cost in handle time on issues that should have been resolved on first contact and an indirect cost in member dissatisfaction, but the root causes of these repeat contacts were entirely unknown.
Excessive agent hold time
The cruise line of business had the highest average speed of answer in the contact center, driven in part by unusually long average handle times. Analysis revealed that agents were frequently placing members on hold while calling cruise lines directly to obtain information or execute transactions, averaging 14 minutes and 26 seconds of hold time per call. This behavior was widespread but not yet documented or quantified as a systemic issue.
Manual quality monitoring at insufficient scale
With coaches reviewing only 2 calls per agent per 28-day period, the quality monitoring program provided a highly limited sample of agent performance. This made it impossible to identify consistent coaching opportunities, assess training effectiveness at a program level, or detect emerging behavioral patterns before they affected member experience at scale.
Our Role
Andrew Reise was engaged to design and build a comprehensive speech analytics program for the organization's contact center, starting with the cruise line of business and delivering the strategic framework for cross-line-of-business expansion.
Contact Center Analytics and VoC Strategy
Andrew Reise designed the full speech category taxonomy, executed structured call studies, and developed the strategic category framework for all lines of business. The work began with structured discovery workshops with contact center leadership to understand the business context, existing data infrastructure, call driver hypotheses, and strategic priorities. These sessions produced the foundational inputs for the category taxonomy and established the prioritization logic for which call types to build and analyze first.
The team then designed and built a comprehensive speech analytics category library covering more than 40 distinct call types organized across three tiers: Customer Experience categories capturing emotional and experiential signals such as repeat calls, confusion, and escalations; all-lines-of-business call drivers applicable across cruise, hotels, air, and vacation packages; and cruise-specific call drivers capturing the booking, pricing, cabin, dining, and cancellation behaviors unique to cruise transactions.
Program and Project Management
Andrew Reise managed the end-to-end program from discovery workshops through category build, call study execution, and framework delivery. This included a structured call study analyzing 31,854 cruise agent interactions over a one-month period to quantify the volume, frequency, and root causes of agent-initiated calls to cruise lines during member interactions, and a dedicated repeat call study isolating and analyzing 73,144 repeat-call interactions using speech-detected patterns rather than agent-assigned wrap codes.
Change Management and Organizational Enablement
Andrew Reise provided the organization with the analytical tools, frameworks, and reporting outputs needed to operate and expand the program independently. The final deliverable, the Strategic Category Framework, mapped the complete extension of the speech analytics program from cruise to vacation packages, hotels, cars, and air, with category definitions, build priorities, and the analytical logic for each line of business.
Industry
Hospitality/ Travel / Membership Services
Case Study Attribute
Speech Analytics / Call Driver Analysis / Contact Center Intelligence / VoC Program Design
-
Repeat contacts identified, representing 18% of total contact center volume, with root causes classified
-
14 minutes and 26 seconds of average hold time per outbound cruise call quantified, establishing the business case for process redesign
-
More than 40 speech categories built, validated, and activated across the cruise line of business
-
A prioritized Strategic Category Framework delivered for extending the program across all remaining lines of business
-
The analytical foundation established for self-service deflection, proactive agent coaching, and automated quality management
Contact Us
Is Your Hospitality Contact Center Ready for a Speech Analytics Program That Sees Every Guest Interaction?
Organizations that operate large contact centers without speech analytics are managing by sample. They know what a small subset of their interactions look like, and they make coaching, training, self-service, and staffing decisions based on that sample. A well-designed speech analytics program eliminates that sampling bias across every performance decision. If your organization is managing a high-volume contact center without this kind of call intelligence infrastructure, that is a conversation worth having.
FAQs
What is a speech analytics program, and how is it different from traditional call recording?
Call recording captures and stores call audio but does not analyze it. Speech analytics processes that audio using phonetic and acoustic pattern recognition to identify specific words, phrases, emotional signals, and behavioral patterns across every recorded interaction. Where call recording provides storage, speech analytics provides intelligence. The difference is the difference between having a library and having read everything in it: the value is not in possession but in the insights extracted. For contact center leaders managing high call volumes, that distinction determines whether the contact center is a cost center or an intelligence source.
How do you design a speech category taxonomy for a complex contact center?
Category taxonomy design begins with a discovery phase that combines stakeholder workshops, existing data review, and hypothesis development to identify the full universe of potential call types. Categories are then prioritized by business impact and built in sequence, starting with the highest-volume and highest-impact call types. Each category is defined by a combination of keyword phrases, proximity rules, and speaker attribution logic that captures the specific call behavior it represents. The taxonomy is validated through sampling and refined iteratively before being activated at scale. In this engagement, that process produced more than 40 distinct categories organized across three tiers.
What is a repeat call, and why does reducing repeat contact volume matter
A repeat call occurs when a member contacts the organization more than once about the same underlying issue, typically because the first interaction did not produce a resolution. Repeat contacts are costly on multiple dimensions: they increase total call volume and handle time, they occupy agent capacity that could be applied to first-contact resolution, and they indicate a member experience failure that, if persistent, degrades satisfaction and loyalty. Identifying the root causes of repeat contacts is the first step toward designing the process, self-service, and training interventions that reduce their frequency. In this engagement, repeat calls accounted for 73,144 interactions and 18% of total contact center volume before root cause analysis had been performed.
How can speech analytics support agent coaching and quality management?
Speech analytics enables quality management at a scale that manual monitoring cannot achieve. Rather than reviewing 2 calls per agent per period, a speech-enabled quality management program can analyze every call for the behaviors, phrases, and patterns that predict quality outcomes. Supervisors can be directed to specific interactions requiring review rather than selecting calls at random, and coaching sessions can be informed by data patterns rather than single-call impressions. Over time, this produces more targeted coaching, faster skill development, and more consistent application of quality standards across the agent population. The contact center optimization programs Andrew Reise designs are built to make this shift from sampled impressions to complete evidence.
What is a self-service deflection strategy, and how does speech analytics support it?
A self-service deflection strategy identifies which call types can be resolved through digital channels such as a website, app, IVR, or chatbot without requiring agent assistance, and designs the interventions needed to shift member behavior toward those channels. Speech analytics supports this strategy by quantifying the volume of calls by type, identifying the member questions and transactions most amenable to self-service resolution, and tracking changes in call volume following self-service deployments. Without accurate call driver data, self-service investment is often misallocated toward channels that do not match actual member behavior. For organizations serving large member or customer populations, this kind of data-grounded deflection strategy is typically the highest-return application of speech intelligence.
How do you extend a speech analytics program across multiple lines of business?
Extension across lines of business follows the same methodology as the initial build: discovery workshops to identify the call driver hypotheses specific to each line of business, category library design and build, call studies to validate category performance, and a prioritized framework for activation. Categories built in the initial line of business often provide a transferable foundation. Many customer experience categories such as repeat calls, confusion, escalations, and positive experience signals apply universally, while product and transaction categories require line-specific development. A strategic category framework developed at program outset provides the roadmap for efficient multi-line-of-business expansion, which is exactly what Andrew Reise delivered here before handing the program to the organization to operate independently.
