$840K in Identified Service Cost Savings from a CX Journey and Roadmap
How a specialty workers' compensation insurance holding company used quantitative and qualitative research across three customer types to build a prioritized CX roadmap and unlock reinvestment capacity
What Is CX Journey Mapping and Why Does It Matter for Insurers?
Most insurance organizations know when their customers are frustrated. However, even with that awareness, it can be challenging to pinpoint exactly where the experience breaks down and what it costs when it does. CX journey mapping closes that gap by tracing the experience of each customer type across every significant interaction, from first contact through resolution, and identifying the specific moments where friction, confusion, or unmet expectations are driving dissatisfaction and avoidable service cost.
Client Opportunity
Our client is a specialty insurance holding company operating across workers' compensation and related specialty markets. Their leadership recognized that improving customer experience requires more than anecdotal feedback. They needed a structured view of the end-to-end claims journey, a fact-based understanding of where the experience was breaking down, and a business case strong enough to secure funding for the improvements that followed. Andrew Reise was engaged to provide that foundation, conducting voice of customer research across three distinct customer segments and delivering a prioritized roadmap with quantified reinvestment capacity.
The Challenge
Improving CX in a specialty insurance environment requires navigating complexity on multiple fronts at once.

Three distinct customer types with fundamentally different definitions of a good experience
Agents, policyholders, and injured workers each interact with the claims process at different moments, for different reasons, and with different expectations about what a good outcome looks like. A research approach that treated them as a single audience would have produced averaged findings that accurately described no one. Designing separate research tracks for each segment, including dedicated customer personas, ensured that our findings were actionable.
No quantified business case to compete for improvement funding
CX initiatives in insurance regularly lose budget battles to operational priorities with clearer, more immediate financial returns. Without a dollar figure attached to the cost of the current experience, improvement proposals read as aspirational rather than necessary. The client needed the voice of customer research to produce a financial case before any roadmap investment could be approved.A list of problems without sequencing
Even a thorough diagnosis leaves organizations stuck if it does not come with a clear answer to what to do first. Sequencing CX improvements requires weighing business impact against execution feasibility and some high-value fixes depend on foundational work that has to come earlier. Without that prioritization layer, improvement programs can stall because no one can agree on where to start.Our Role
Andrew Reise was engaged to lead an end-to-end CX research and roadmap engagement, producing a prioritized improvement plan with a quantified financial case for a specialty workers' compensation insurer serving three distinct customer segments.
Research and Segmentation
Quantitative and qualitative research was conducted separately across agents, policyholders, and injured workers, each mapped to the touchpoints and failure modes specific to that segment. Personas were developed for each customer type to capture the distinct needs, expectations, and experience gaps that a combined research approach may not have surfaced. The segmented findings gave the organization a fact-based view of where the experience was breaking down and for whom.
Journey Mapping
Current-state journey maps were built for all three customer segments, translating research findings into a visual representation of the claims experience from first contact through resolution. The maps surfaced the specific moments where service quality was degrading and where internal process friction was creating costs that showed up as avoidable contacts, escalations, and repeat interactions. That granularity was what made the subsequent financial analysis possible.
Future State and Roadmap
Future-state ideation sessions moved from diagnosis to design, generating improvement concepts tied directly to the journey map findings rather than generic best practices. Those concepts were evaluated and sequenced into a prioritized CX strategic roadmap across four domains: foundational operations, communication, culture, and ROI-tagged initiatives. The embedded financial analysis identified $840K in service cost reduction opportunities, giving leadership a reinvestment case rather than a request for net-new budget.
Industry
Financial Services, Workers' Compensation Insurance
Case Study Attribute
CX Strategy, Journey Mapping, Voice of Customer Research
Contact Us
Ready to turn your claims experience into a source of competitive advantage?
A CX roadmap is only as useful as the business case underneath it. If your organization is preparing to improve the claims or service experience and needs research-grounded prioritization and a funded path forward, that conversation is worth having early.
FAQs
How does Andrew Reise approach CX research when multiple customer segments are involved?
We begin with a segmentation framework that recognizes each group's distinct journey rather than treating all customers as a single audience. In this engagement, that meant separate quantitative and qualitative research tracks for agents, policyholders, and injured workers, each mapped to the specific touchpoints and failure modes most relevant to that segment. The personas and journey maps that came out of that process allowed the roadmap to address segment-specific problems rather than averaging across them.
How was the $840K service cost opportunity identified?
The cost analysis was embedded in the journey mapping work. By mapping the current-state experience against internal service data, we identified specific interactions where process friction was generating avoidable service volume, repeat contacts, or escalations. Each identified opportunity was quantified at the activity level and aggregated to produce the total. The $840K figure represents cost that could be eliminated and redirected to technology investment rather than absorbed as a baseline operating expense.
What does a prioritized CX roadmap actually include?
The roadmap produced for the client structured improvement initiatives across four domains: foundational operations (process and data corrections that enable everything else), communication (how information moves between the company and customers at key journey moments), culture (the internal behaviors and incentives that shape the customer experience from the inside), and ROI-tagged initiatives (improvements with a quantified financial return). Each initiative was sized for effort and sequenced to reflect both impact potential and organizational readiness.
Can this type of engagement work for other lines of specialty insurance beyond workers' comp?
Yes. The research and journey mapping methodology Andrew Reise uses is designed to surface the specific experience dynamics of any insurance segment, whether personal lines, commercial, life and annuities, or specialty markets. What changes is the customer type, the journey structure, and the regulatory environment. The analytical approach, the roadmap structure, and the financial framing remain consistent.
